What is Canada's pathway to limit global warming to 1.5°C?

Power

Last update: 1 December 2023

Power sector in 2030

The power sector would need to be fully decarbonised by 2030 and contribute to negative emissions thereafter to be on 1.5°C compatible. Achieving such a pathway will require ramping up renewable energy in Canada’s power generation from 67% in 2017, to 91–99% by 2030, an earlier phase-out of coal than is currently planned (by 2026, not 2030), and phasing out natural gas between 2026-2033, which the government has not yet considered. Continuing to invest in fossil fuels puts the country at risk of carbon lock-in and high-cost stranded assets.1

Canada's power mix

terawatt-hour per year

Scaling

Dimension

In the 100%RE scenario, non-energy fossil fuel demand is not included.

  • Graph description

    Power energy mix composition in generation (TWh) and capacities (GW) for the years 2030, 2040 and 2050 based on selected IPCC SR1.5 global least costs pathways and a 100% renewable energy pathway. Selected countries include the Stated Policies Scenario from the IEA's World Energy Outlook 2021.

    Methodology

    Data References

Towards a fully decarbonised power sector

The power sector could reach a fully decarbonised power sector by 2030 and become a source of net negative emissions thereafter. To be 1.5°C compatible, the carbon intensity of the power sector would need to reach –10 to –20 gCO₂e/kWh by 2050. This would require Canada to achieve 91-99% renewable energy in the power mix by 2030 and 99-100% by 2050 and contribute to negative emissions thereafter, allowing to balance emissions from other sectors such as agriculture.

Canada's power sector emissions and carbon intensity

MtCO₂/yr

Unit

Investments

Yearly investment requirements in renewable energy

Across the set of 1.5°C pathways that we have analysed, annual investments in renewable energy excluding BECCS increase in Canada to be on the order of USD 10 to 48 billion by 2030 and 11 to 64 billion by 2040 depending on the scenario considered. The ‘high energy demand, low CDR reliance’ pathway shows a particularly high increase in renewable capacity investments, which could be driven by an increase of electrification of end-use sectors and growing energy demand. Other modelled pathways have relatively lower investments in renewables and rely to varying degrees on other technologies and measures such as energy efficiency and negative emissions technologies, of which the later can require high up-front investments.

Demand shifting towards the power sector

The 1.5°C compatible pathways analysed here tend to show a strong increase in power generation and installed capacities across time compared with a current policy scenario. This is because end-use sectors (such as transport, buildings or industry) are increasingly electrified under 1.5°C compatible pathways, shifting energy demand to the power sector. Globally, the “high energy demand” entails a particularly high degree of renewable energy-based electrification across the various sectors, and sees a considerable increase in renewable energy capacities over time.

Canada's renewable electricity investments

Billion USD / yr

Scaling

  • Graph description

    Annual investments required for variable and conventional renewables installed capacities excluding BECCS across time under 1.5°C compatible pathway.

    Methodology

1.5°C compatible power sector benchmarks

Carbon intensity, renewable generation share, and fossil fuel generation share from illustrative 1.5°C pathways for Canada

Indicator
2019
2030
2040
2050
Decarbonised power sector by
Carbon intensity of power
gCO₂/kWh
128
2 to 4
-8 to 0
-22 to -4
2029 to 2030
Relative to reference year in %
-98 to -97%
-106 to -100%
-117 to -103%
Indicator
2019
2030
2040
2050
Year of phase-out
Share of unabated coal
per cent
7
0 to 0
0 to 0
0 to 0
Share of unabated gas
per cent
11
0 to 1
0 to 0
0 to 0
2027 to 2034
Share of renewable energy
per cent
66
90 to 99
97 to 100
99 to 100
Share of unabated fossil fuel
per cent
18
0 to 1
0 to 0
0 to 0

BECCS are the only Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) technologies considered in these benchmarks
All values are rounded

Cookie settings

Just like other websites, we use cookies to improve and personalize your experience. We collect standard Internet log information and aggregated data to analyse our traffic. Our preference cookies allow us to adapt our content to our audience interests.