Skip to content

Namibia Sectors

What is Namibiaʼs pathway to limit global warming to 1.5°C?

Power sector in 2030

In 2020, Namibia’s electricity demand was 597 MW with an annual growth rate of 3%.2 According to the National Integrated Resource Plan (NIRP) revised in 2016, peak demand is projected to rise to 931 MW in 2025 and 1348 MW in 2030.

On the supply side, Namibia has only four major power generating stations, with a combined installed capacity of about 500 MW.

The Ruacana Hydroelectric Power Station (330 MW), on Nigeria’s Northern border with Angola, is the core of the country’s domestic power supply.9 As a ‘run-of-the-river’ scheme it is highly dependent on rainfall in the Southern Angolan catchment area, which makes Namibia’s electricity grid subject to drought-related strains.

Other power stations are a coal fired power station in Windhoek (Van Eck) and two diesel powered stations – the Paratus and Anixas stations – only used in emergencies due to the cost of use. From 2015-2017, six solar power plants were commissioned with a total capacity of 29.5 MW. Even so, Namibia’s demand still outstrips its supply.2

This means imported electricity dominates Namibia’s power mix – in the decade to 2017, Namibia imported nearly 60% of its electricity supply, mostly from South Africa, where electricity is predominantly produced using coal, but also from other countries in the Southern Africa Power Pool.3,4

Namibia’s 2021 updated NDC includes mitigation measures such as implementing a renewable energy feed-in tariff and adding renewable energy capacity. According to the updated NDC, these measures add up to nearly 700 MW of renewable energy capacity and a mitigation potential of 0.5 MtCO₂e.1

Towards a fully decarbonised power sector

Given the small scale of the current grid and the dominance of hydro in Namibia’s power sector, the carbon intensity of electricity needs to reduce from just 60 gCO₂/kWh in 2019 to zero between 2025-2027 to be 1.5°C compatible. This would be driven by the phase out of both coal and other unabated fossil fuels from the power mix by no later than 2030, as well as increasing renewable energy to 100% of the power mix by the same year.

1 Republic of Namibia. Namibia’s NDC Update. (2021).

2 Republic of Namibia. Fourth Biennial Update Report (BUR4) to the UNFCCC. (2021).

3 Ministry of Mines and Energy. National Energy Policy. (2017).

4 United Nations Environment Programme. Atlas of Africa Energy Resources. (2017).

5 IEA. Data & Statistics – IEA. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-browser?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy consumption&indicator=ElecConsPerCapita (2021).

6 Net Zero Tracker. Namibia profile. (2022).

7 Ministry of Mines and Energy. National Renewable Energy Policy. (2017).

8 IRENA. Energy Profile: Namibia. (2022).

9 Namibia Power Corporation. NamPower – Ruacana Power Station. (2022).

10 Republic of Namibia. Fourth National Communication to the UNFCCC. (2020).

11 There is no data for the commercial and public buildings sector before 1996.

12 Note that a Carbon Tax – starting at N$40 per g/km of CO₂ in the 2016-2020 transition period – is mentioned in the 4th Biennial Update Report (BUR4), published in early 2021, however, there is no mention of any extension in the NDC submitted to the UNFCCC in late 2021.

Namibiaʼs power mix

terawatt-hour per year

Scaling
Dimension
SSP1 Low CDR reliance
2019203020402050203040
100%RE
2019203020402050203040
SSP1 High CDR reliance
2019203020402050203040
Low energy demand
2019203020402050203040
High energy demand - Low CDR reliance
2019203020402050203040
  • Negative emissions technologies via BECCS
  • Unabated fossil
  • Nuclear and/or fossil with CCS
  • Renewables incl. biomass

Namibiaʼs power sector emissions and carbon intensity

MtCO₂/yr

Unit
−0.100.10.22010203020502070
  • Historical emissions
  • SSP1 High CDR reliance
  • SSP1 Low CDR reliance
  • High energy demand - Low CDR reliance
  • Low energy demand
  • 100%RE

1.5°C compatible power sector benchmarks

Carbon intensity, renewable generation share, and fossil fuel generation share from illustrative 1.5°C pathways for Namibia

Indicator
2019
2030
2040
2050
Decarbonised power sector by
Carbon intensity of power
gCO₂/kWh
60
−20 to 0
−20 to 0
−10
2025 to 2027
Relative to reference year in %
−128 to −98%
−133 to −102%
−116 to −113%
Indicator
2019
2030
2040
2050
Year of phase-out
Share of unabated coal
Percent
4
0
0
0
2024
Share of unabated gas
Percent
0
0
0
0
Share of renewable energy
Percent
95
100
100
100
Share of unabated fossil fuel
Percent
5
0
0
0

Investments

Demand shifting towards the power sector

The 1.5°C compatible pathways analysed here tend to show a strong increase in power generation and installed capacities across time. This is because end-use sectors (such as transport, buildings or industry) are increasingly electrified under 1.5°C compatible pathways, shifting energy demand to the power sector. Globally, the “high energy demand” pathway entails a particularly high degree of renewable energy-based electrification across the various sectors, and sees a considerable increase in renewable energy capacities over time. See the power section for capacities deployment under the various models.

Namibiaʼs renewable electricity investments

Billion USD / yr

20302040205020600.1

Yearly investment requirements in renewable energy

Across the set of 1.5°C pathways that we have analysed, annual investments in renewable energy excluding BECCS increase in Namibia to be on the order of USD 0.1 to 0.5 billion by 2030 and 0.1 to 1 billion by 2040 depending on the scenario considered. The ‘high energy demand, and low CDR reliance’ pathway shows a particularly high increase in renewable capacity investments, which could be driven by an increase of electrification of end-use sectors, growing energy demand, and expansion of electricity access. Other modelled pathways have relatively lower investments in renewables and rely to varying degrees on other technologies and measures such as energy efficiency and negative emissions technologies, of which the latter can require high up-front investments.

Footnotes