In Indonesia, the industrial sector makes up 37% of direct CO₂ emissions and has the highest share in primary energy demand at 36.4% in 2019.23,24 While its energy demand has been volatile since 2008, it has steadily increased since 1990 at an annual rate of 6.4% reaching 36% in 2019.24 Analysed scenarios show that in 1.5°C compatible pathway share of electricity in industry will increase in the range of 18-20% by 2030 and 45-56% by 2050 from 2019 level of 14%. All scenarios see a rapid decline in direct CO₂ emissions to 75-79 MtCO₂/yr by 2030, and 14-15 MtCO₂/yr by 2050 from 2019 level of 180 MtCO₂/yr. This decline will mostly be driven by increased energy efficiency.
The sectoral primary energy demand is heavily dominated by fossil fuels (75% in 2019), comprising of coal 42%, oil 11% and natural gas 22% in 2019. All scenarios show peaking of fossil energy demand by 2025-2030, and a declining trend after that to reach 14-54% share by 2050.
The share of industrial process emissions is 6.3% of total emissions excluding LULUCF (59 MtCO₂e/yr in 2019), increasing since 1990.25 All scenarios except one show a declining trend of process emissions from 2025, reaching up to -3 to 57 MtCO₂e/yr by 2050.
Energy efficiency improvements in Indonesia constitute an important intervention for industrial energy conservation as better energy efficiency prevented 8% of additional energy use between 2010 and 2018.26 Additionally, structural change of the economic activities from energy intensive manufacturing to the less energy intensive service sector has contributed significantly to emissions reduction, particularly in the period 2014-18.26 As a part of industrial emissions intensity reduction policy Indonesia is set to expand its biofuel blending mandate beyond transport sector for industries also.
29 While global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C provide useful guidance for an upper-limit of emissions trajectories for developed countries, they underestimate the feasible space for such countries to reach net zero earlier. The current generation of models tend to depend strongly on land-use sinks outside of currently developed countries and include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches. The scientific teams which provide these global pathways constantly improve the technologies represented in their models – and novel CDR technologies are now being included in new studies focused on deep mitigation scenarios meeting the Paris Agreement. A wide assessment database of these new scenarios is not yet available; thus, we rely on available scenarios which focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology. Accordingly, we do not yet consider land-sector emissions (LULUCF) and other CDR approaches.
30 Fossil fuel with CCS in the power sector are very likely to emit at the very least a tenth of the average emissions compared with an installation without CCS and therefore cannot be considered a zero or low-carbon technology. Costs of CCS in the power sector have remained stagnant over the last decade. CCS technologies in the power sector also have a non-trivial sustainability footprint in terms of increased water use, higher fossil resource demands and consequential mining and production footprint, and in general do not address local air pollution concerns. The CCS technologies are also uncertain regarding security of storage over very long periods of time and the need for legal structure to allow it to happen.
Indonesiaʼs industry sector direct CO₂ emissions (of energy demand)
MtCO₂/yr
Unit
05010015020019902010203020502070
Historical emissions
High energy demand - Low CDR reliance
SSP1 Low CDR reliance
SSP1 High CDR reliance
Low energy demand
Indonesiaʼs GHG emissions from industrial processes
MtCO₂e/yr
020406019902010203020502070
SSP1 Low CDR reliance
SSP1 High CDR reliance
Low energy demand
High energy demand - Low CDR reliance
Historical emissions
1.5°C compatible industry sector benchmarks
Direct CO₂ emissions, direct electrification rates, and combined shares of electricity, hydrogen and biomass from illustrative 1.5°C pathways for Indonesia