What is Ethiopia's pathway to limit global warming to 1.5°C?
Ambition Gap
1.5°C compatible pathways
Ethiopia’s conditional NDC translates into emissions of 213 MtCO₂e/yr by 2030 when excluding LULUCF emissions, or 75% above 2015 levels.1 With international support, Ethiopia will be able to implement its domestic emissions pathway and close the gap between its fair share level and domestic emissions level. Paris compatible pathways show emissions reductions of 10-37% below 2015 levels or 76-110 MtCO₂e/yr by 2030 excluding LULUCF.
Ethiopia has committed to funding 20% of its mitigation target in its NDC and to increase its ambition in subsequent years through various sectors as it seeks to align all sectors to climate resilience.2
Ethiopia's total GHG emissions excl. LULUCF MtCO₂e/yr
*Net zero emissions excl LULUCF is achieved through deployment of BECCS; other novel CDR is not included in these pathways
-
Graph description
The figure shows national 1.5°C compatible emissions pathways. This is presented through a set of illustrative pathways and a 1.5°C compatible range for total GHG emissions excl. LULUCF. The 1.5°C compatible range is based on global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC SR1.5, defined by the 5th-50th percentiles of the distributions of such pathways which achieve the LTTG of the Paris Agreement. We consider one primary net-negative emission technology in our analysis (BECCS) due to data availability. Net negative emissions from the land-sector (LULUCF) and novel CDR technologies are not included in this analysis due to data limitations from the assessed models. Furthermore, in the global cost-effective model pathways we analyse, such negative emissions sources are usually underestimated in developed country regions, with current-generation models relying on land sinks in developing countries.
Methodology
Data References
-
Long term pathway
Ethiopia has indicated its goal to become ‘carbon neutral’ but has not yet announced a net zero CO₂ target, nor provided clarity on its scope. Ethiopia is in the process of developing a long-term strategy.3
A 1.5°C compatible pathway would require GHG emissions excluding LULUCF to reduce by 22% (10-37%) below 2015 levels by 2050.4 This requires a focus on decarbonising major emitting sectors namely agriculture and energy, and stringent policies in the land sector, to reduce emissions and further become a sink, through the halting of deforestation.
Ethiopia's primary energy mix
petajoule per year
-
Graph description
Primary energy mix composition in consumption (EJ) and shares (%) for the years 2030, 2040 and 2050 based selected global least cost pathways.
Methodology
Data References
-
Energy system transformation
Although Ethiopia relies on a high amount of renewable energy (around 90% of its total primary energy consumption), close to 88% in 2017 comes from traditional biomass (the burning of charcoal and firewood) mostly used for cooking.5,6 While the country will need to keep up its share of renewables, there will need to be a shift away from biomass to other conventional renewables sources such as solar, wind and hydro. Reducing biomass as a source of energy will steer emissions reductions in the LULUCF sector, by reducing deforestation.7
Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy initiative (CRGE) states that the country aims to increase electricity supply at a rate of 14% per annum mainly from hydropower, geothermal and wind with ‘virtually zero GHG emissions’.8 With a current installed capacity of 4244 MW, of which over 95% (4140 MW) is renewable (hydro, wind and geothermal), this looks like a realistic target.9,10,11
Its draft energy policy includes increased electrification as well as grid reliability, increased access to modern cooking technologies and promotion of renewables.12,13,14,15 Due to high initial costs, limited access, monthly billing and low reliability for electricity combined with cultural factors,16 electric cooking, LPG uptake, biogas, and improved biofuel stoves uptake has been slow in comparison to kerosene, charcoal and firewood.17,18
While Ethiopia’s Growth and Transformation Plan II (GTP II) Ethiopia had planned to source more than 90% of its increased capacity in energy production from renewables by 2020 the country still sees coal and nuclear in its future as well as continued importation of fossil fuels. This risks the creation of high-cost stranded assets, despite huge renewable energy potential estimated at >80 TWh in 2030.19,20 Electricity generation reached 44% and power 66% of their respective targets by 2017, and access to electricity had reached 57% coverage in 2017 whereas the country targets 90% by 2020.21,22,23,24
Ethiopia's total CO₂ emissions excl. LULUCF MtCO₂/yr
-
Graph description
1.5°C compatible CO₂ emissions pathways. This is presented through a set of illustrative pathways and a 1.5°C compatible range for total CO₂ emissions excl. LULUCF. The 1.5°C compatible range is based on global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC SR1.5, defined by the 5th and 5th percentiles.
Methodology
Data References
-
1.5°C compatible emissions benchmarks
Key emissions benchmarks of Paris compatible Pathways for Ethiopia. The 1.5°C compatible range is based on the Paris Agreement compatible pathways from the IPCC SR1.5 filtered with sustainability criteria. The median (50th percentile) to 5th percentile and middle of the range are provided here. Relative reductions are provided based on the reference year.
Indicator |
2015
Reference year
|
2019
|
2030
|
2040
|
2050
|
Year of net zero
incl. BECCS excl. LULUCF and novel CDR
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total GHG
Megatonnes CO₂ equivalent per year
|
151
|
166
|
113
92 to
126
|
100
80 to
105
|
90
70 to
107
|
|
Relative to reference year in %
|
-25%
-39 to
-17%
|
-34%
-47 to
-31%
|
-41%
-54 to
-29%
|
|||
Total CO₂
MtCO₂/yr
|
19
|
25
|
19
16 to
22
|
11
6 to
17
|
5
0 to
13
|
2062
|
Relative to reference year in %
|
5%
-15 to
21%
|
-41%
-69 to
-11%
|
-75%
-98 to
-28%
|
All information excluding LULUCF emissions and novel CDR approaches. BECCS are the only carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies considered in these benchmarks
All values are rounded
-
Methodology
Data References
-