Although the US’ updated NDC shows an increase in ambition, now targeting a 50–52% reduction in total GHG emissions below 2005 levels by 2030 including LULUCF (equivalent to 44–47% excluding LULUCF), it is not yet consistent with a 1.5˚C compatible pathway.2 Our analysis indicates that the US would need to increase its new NDC emissions reduction target to 62% below 2005 levels by 2030 to be 1.5˚C compatible (excl. LULUCF).
The country’s current policies (as of August 2022) are insufficient to achieve its updated NDC target; however, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) included in the assessment significantly narrowed the gap.3
A fair share contribution to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions compatible with the Paris Agreement would require the US to go further than its domestic target, and provide substantial support to developing countries. The Climate Action Tracker assesses that the US’ fair share (domestic and international support) would require the country to provide support for mitigation abroad equivalent to domestic emissions reductions of at least 75% below 2005 levels by 2030 when excluding LULUCCF on top of its domestic reductions.4
Long term pathway
The US long term strategy (LTS) aims to reach net zero emissions by 2050.5 By mid-century, in a Paris Agreement compatible pathway, GHG emissions should not be higher than 0.1–0.8 GtCO₂e/yr or around 89–99% below 2005 levels excluding land sinks but including the use of BECCS.17
While the energy sector could be fully decarbonised as early as 2038, remaining emissions, mostly from agriculture and waste sectors, will need to be balanced with negative CO₂ emissions through the deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approaches.
17 While global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C provide useful guidance for an upper-limit of emissions trajectories for developed countries, they underestimate the feasible space for such countries to reach net zero earlier. The current generation of models tend to depend strongly on land-use sinks outside of currently developed countries and include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches. The scientific teams which provide these global pathways constantly improve the technologies represented in their models – and novel CDR technologies are now being included in new studies focused on deep mitigation scenarios meeting the Paris Agreement. A wide assessment database of these new scenarios is not yet available; thus, we rely on available scenarios which focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology. Accordingly, we do not yet consider land-sector emissions (LULUCF) and other CDR approaches which developed countries will need to implement in order to counterbalance their remaining emissions and reach net zero GHG are not considered here due to data availability.
18 In some of the analysed pathways, the energy sector assumes already a certain amount of carbon dioxide removal technologies, in this case bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS).
The required CO₂ emissions cuts would need to come mainly from the decarbonisation of the country’s energy mix. Across most analysed pathways, this requires absolute fossil fuel consumption to be more than halved by 2030 from more than 80% of the primary energy mix in 2019. To support this decarbonisation pathway, renewable energy needs to increase from 8% of the total primary energy mix in 2019 to 21-46% by 2030. Some models show a penetration of negative CO₂ emissions technologies such as BECCS by 2030, implying that the country may need to plan their development in the next few years.
Key emissions benchmarks of Paris compatible Pathways for The United States. The 1.5°C compatible range is based on the Paris Agreement compatible pathways from the IPCC SR1.5 filtered with sustainability criteria. The median (50th percentile) to 5th percentile and middle of the range are provided here. Relative reductions are provided based on the reference year.