The transport sector is responsible for about 30% of Tanzania’s CO₂ emissions (or around 4% of overall emissions incl. LULUCF).
1.5°C compatible pathways show an increase in electrification to between 6-21% by 2030, and 25-44% by 2050, from almost 0% in 2019. Tanzania could fully decarbonise the sector between 2047-2050. This would require policies to develop the transport sector around renewable-based electricity, among others.15
Tanzania is set to expand its bus rapid transit (BRT) network, develop non-motorised transport and invest in ‘low emission transport systems’ to lower its emissions.7 Its updated NDC lists transport as a priority sector for mitigation, with measures such as bus rapid transit (BRT) expansion, and establishment of non-motorised transport.1 Tanzania has also embarked on a 2,561km railway project. 1,637km of this is electric, with 300km between Dar and Morogoro already finalised and being operationalised.17
1 United Republic of Tanzania. Updated Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). (Vice President’s Office, Union and Environment, 2021).
2 United Republic of Tanzania. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC). (2015).
9 United Republic of Tanzania. National Five Year Development Plan 2016/17-2020/21: Nurturing Industrialization for Economic Transformation and Human Development. (2016).
10 The United Republic of Tanzania. Nationally Determined Contribution. (2021).
11 Kajubi, F. UK lauds Tanzania’s plans towards net zero carbon emission reduction. The Guardian (2021).
12 Irene Garcia, Anna Leidreiter, Joachim Fünfgelt, Sixbert Mwanga & Msololo Onditi. Policy Roadmap for 100% Renewable Energy and Poverty Eradication in Tanzania. (2017).
19 Global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C tend to include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches, and often rely on rather conservative assumptions in the development of renewable energy technologies. This tends to result in greater reliance on technological CDR than if a faster transition to renewables were achieved. The scenarios available at the time of this analysis focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology, and our downscaling methods do not yet take national BECCS potentials into account.
Tanzaniaʼs transport sector direct CO₂ emissions (of energy demand)
MtCO₂/yr
Unit
24681019902010203020502070
Historical emissions
SSP1 High CDR reliance
SSP1 Low CDR reliance
High energy demand - Low CDR reliance
Low energy demand
1.5°C compatible transport sector benchmarks
Direct CO₂ emissions and shares of electricity, biofuels and hydrogen in the transport final energy demand from illustrative 1.5°C pathways for Tanzania