Emissions from the building sector have increased by 84% in the past 10 years. There was a large increase in direct CO₂ emissions of the buildings sector energy demand in 2015, resulting from an increase in coal consumption.24 All 1.5°C scenarios show an immediate decline in emissions.
In 2019, the energy demand in this sector was mostly met with electricity (75%), and fossil fuels (20%, with coal 5% and oil 15%), and biomass (5%). The electricity mix was however in 2019 made of 69% of fossil fuels (see the power section for more details).
Viet Nam could reach ´zero building sector emissions by 2037-2049. The “low energy demand” scenario reaches full decarbonisation rapidly. In this scenario, the electricity share in the building sector energy demand reaches 90% share by 2030, and 96% by 2050. The building sector would be largely decarbonised if it underwent high rates of electrification, in combination with high renewable energy penetration in the power sector. (i.e. meeting the benchmarks of 93-95% renewable power by 2030 and a decarbonised power sector by 2035/6). Green hydrogen could also play a part in the building sector energy mix with a share of up to 3% in 2030, 2040, and 2050, following 1.5°C pathways.
To decarbonise the building sector, Viet Nam would need to phase out fossil fuels and replace wood and coal stoves and heating/cooling with energy efficient electric appliances.
3 Chapman, A., Urmee, T., Shem, C. & Fuentes, U. Energy transition to renewable energies. Opportunities for Australian cooperation with Vietnam. (2019).
12 Viet Nam Government. Resolution 55-NQ/TW – On Orientations of the Viet Nam’s National Energy Development Strategy to 2030 and outlook to 2045. (2020).
28 While global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C provide useful guidance for an upper-limit of emissions trajectories for developed countries, they underestimate the feasible space for such countries to reach net zero earlier. The current generation of models tend to depend strongly on land-use sinks outside of currently developed countries and include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches. The scientific teams which provide these global pathways constantly improve the technologies represented in their models – and novel CDR technologies are now being included in new studies focused on deep mitigation scenarios meeting the Paris Agreement. A wide assessment database of these new scenarios is not yet available; thus, we rely on available scenarios which focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology. Accordingly, we do not yet consider land-sector emissions (LULUCF) and other CDR approaches.