Saudi Arabia increased its renewable energy capacity rapidly over the past decade reaching 440 MW in 2021, most of which (330MW) was installed in 2021 alone.8 Despite this growth, the share of renewable energy in the power mix was 0.5% in 2019.14 As per the National Renewable Energy Program under the Vision 2030 strategy, Saudi Arabia aims to install 27 GW and 59 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2023 and 2030, respectively.10 In 2021, Saudi Arabia announced signed deals to construct seven utility-scale solar plants of 3.7 GW combined capacity.12 While these are steps in the right direction, more needs to be done to be consistent with a 1.5°C compatible pathway.
While the power mix today is close to 100% reliant on fossil fuels, the share of fossil fuels would need to decline to 0–5% by 2040 and 0% by 2050. Some models show a phasing out of oil by 2030 and others a reduction from 46% in 2017 to 0–20% by 2050.22 Renewable energy can reach up to a 29% share by 2030. A higher penetration of renewable energy sources leads to lower levels of fossil fuels and avoids the need to rely on currently costly, unproven carbon capture and storage technologies. The Saudi government has announced that it will cease electricity generation from oil from 2030 onward, but the policies to implement this target are still lacking.10
Towards a fully decarbonised power sector
To align with a 1.5°C compatible pathway, Saudi Arabia will need to fully decarbonise its electricity supply around 2040s. Gas power plants will need to be phased out between 2040 and 2047 and renewable energy sources, essentially negligible in 2019, need to dominate the country’s power mix with an 86–94% share by 2040 and 92–100% by mid-century.
1.5°C compatible pathways further show that the power sector will need to reduce its carbon intensity from 620 gCO₂/kWh in 2019 by as much as half by 2030. With a certain amount of carbon dioxide removal technology deployment, in this case bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS), the sector’s carbon intensity goes down to -80 gCO₂/kWh by 2050. A delay in phasing out fossil fuels from the power mix would require Saudi Arabia to rely more heavily on negative emissions technologies, which would mean higher investment needs.
The government’s focus on CCS development, a technology not currently available at scale, requires massive investments and is inherently risky. A failure for CCS technologies to achieve commercial viability would make Saudi Arabia’s mitigation burden bigger, and raise the risk of stranded assets.
1 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Updated First Nationally Determined Contribution 2021 Submission to UNFCCC. (2021).
20 In some of the analysed pathways, the energy sector assumes already a certain amount of carbon dioxide removal technologies, in this case bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS).
21 While global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C provide useful guidance for an upper-limit of emissions trajectories for developed countries, they underestimate the feasible space for such countries to reach net zero earlier. The current generation of models tend to depend strongly on land-use sinks outside of currently developed countries and include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches. The scientific teams which provide these global pathways constantly improve the technologies represented in their models – and novel CDR technologies are now being included in new studies focused on deep mitigation scenarios meeting the Paris Agreement. A wide assessment database of these new scenarios is not yet available; thus, we rely on available scenarios which focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology. Accordingly, we do not yet consider land-sector emissions (LULUCF) and other CDR approaches.
22 The Low CDR Reliance (AIM/CGESSP-1) scenario shows an oil share of 21% in power mix in 2050 after peaking in 2030. Low Energy Demand scenario (MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM) project the oil share to be 1.7% in 2050. Rest of the scenarios project oil to be phased out from the Saudi power mix by 2050.
Saudi Arabiaʼs power sector emissions and carbon intensity
MtCO₂/yr
Unit
−100010020019902010203020502070
Historical emissions
SSP1 High CDR reliance
SSP1 Low CDR reliance
High energy demand - Low CDR reliance
Low energy demand
100%RE
1.5°C compatible power sector benchmarks
Carbon intensity, renewable generation share, and fossil fuel generation share from illustrative 1.5°C pathways for Saudi Arabia
Indicator
2019
2030
2040
2050
Decarbonised power sector by
Carbon intensity of power
gCO₂/kWh
620
310 to 380
0 to 20
−80 to 0
2040 to 2043
Relative to reference year in %
−50 to −38%
−100 to −96%
−113 to −100%
Indicator
2019
2030
2040
2050
Year of phase-out
Share of unabated coal
Percent
0
0
0
0
Share of unabated gas
Percent
56
31 to 32
0 to 5
0
2040 to 2047
Share of renewable energy
Percent
0
5 to 29
86 to 94
92 to 100
Share of unabated fossil fuel
Percent
100
71 to 90
0 to 6
0
Investments
Demand shifting towards the power sector
The 1.5°C compatible pathways analysed here tend to show a strong increase in power generation and installed capacities across time. This is because end-use sectors (such as transport, buildings or industry) are increasingly electrified under 1.5°C compatible pathways, shifting energy demand to the power sector. Globally, the “high energy demand” pathway entails a particularly high degree of renewable energy-based electrification across the various sectors, and sees a considerable increase in renewable energy capacities over time. See the power section for capacities deployment under the various models.
Saudi Arabiaʼs renewable electricity investments
Billion USD / yr
203020402050206020
Yearly investment requirements in renewable energy
Across the set of 1.5°C pathways that we have analysed, annual investments in renewable energy excluding BECCS increase in Saudi Arabia to be on the order of USD 0.5 to 8.8 billion by 2030 and 1.9 to 48.7 billion by 2040 depending on the scenario considered. The ‘high energy demand, low CDR reliance’ pathway shows a particularly high increase in renewable capacity investments, which could be driven by an increase of electrification of end-use sectors, such as transport with the expansion of railways and electric vehicles; and the expansion of electricity access through investments in increased grid interconnections with neighbouring countries and updates to grid infrastructure. Other modelled pathways have relatively lower investments in renewables and rely to varying degrees on other technologies and measures such as energy efficiency and negative emissions technologies, of which the latter can require high up-front investments.