In May 2021, Nigeria submitted an interim update NDC report reiterating the targets put forward in 2017, but notes the government has not yet approved the ambition level in mitigation. The interim report also significantly revises historical and BAU emissions.
Considering these revisions, Nigeria’s NDC targets GHG emission level of 214 MtCO₂e/yr by 2030 (excl. LULUCF) translating to 33% below 2015 levels by 2030 (excl. LULUCF).19
Nigeria’s conditional NDC target is just above the lower bound of the 1.5°C compatible range requiring 13-35% emissions reductions below 2015 levels by 2030 (or 210-281 MtCO₂e/yr) excluding LULUCF. Nigeria’s conditional NDC target may be well in line with 1.5°C compatible pathways; however, this is highly contingent on the role of LULUCF emissions in meeting the target.
The implementation of Nigeria’s domestic emissions pathway will be made possible with and through international support to close the gap between its fair share level and domestic emissions level.17
Long term pathway
By mid-century, GHG emissions in Nigeria should be almost cut in half, by 42% below 2015 levels excl. LULUCF. CO₂ emissions excl. LULUCF should be reduced substantially to 76% below 2015 levels by 2050.18
Remaining emissions from the agriculture and waste sectors will need to be balanced with negative CO₂ emissions through the deployment of carbon dioxide removals approaches.
While Nigeria does not have a net zero target as of April 2021, the government is developing a long-term strategy for 2050.12 Nigeria’s Vice President Yemi Osinbajo expressed support for a net zero economy, though emphasized the importance of natural gas in the transition.13,14 Continued investment in natural gas may lock Nigeria into higher emissions and increases the risk of stranded assets.
1 Federal Republic of Nigeria. Submission of an Interim Report of the Updated Nationally Determined Contribution. (2021).
15 Ministry of Power. National Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Policy. (2015)
16 See the Climate Action Tracker for assumptions.
17 See Climate Action Tracker, forthcoming analysis on Nigeria.
18 While global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C provide useful guidance for an upper-limit of emissions trajectories for developed countries, they underestimate the feasible space for such countries to reach net zero earlier. The current generation of models tend to depend strongly on land-use sinks outside of currently developed countries and include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches. The scientific teams which provide these global pathways constantly improve the technologies represented in their models – and novel CDR technologies are now being included in new studies focused on deep mitigation scenarios meeting the Paris Agreement. A wide assessment database of these new scenarios is not yet available; thus, we rely on available scenarios which focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology. Accordingly, we do not yet consider land-sector emissions (LULUCF) and other CDR approaches.
20 In some of the analysed pathways, the power sector assumes already a certain amount of carbon dioxide removal technologies, in this case bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS).
Although Nigeria relies on a high amount of renewable energy (around 77% of its total primary energy consumption), close to 99% of the renewable energy share in 2017 comes from traditional biomass (the burning of charcoal and firewood) mostly used for cooking. While the country will need to keep up its share of renewables, there will need to be a shift away from biomass to other conventional renewables such as solar, wind and hydro. Reducing biomass as a source of energy will steer emissions reductions in the LULUCF sector, by reducing deforestation.
1.5°C compatible pathways show a slow increase in renewable energy out to 2050 when the energy system could either secure most of its energy from renewables or rely on the use of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) with a lower penetration of renewables.20 Since deployment of BECCS may be limited by sustainable availability of land, setting in place policy frameworks to increase the share of renewables would be the safest option. For Nigeria, this also requires an increase in the electrification rate of end-use sectors through increasing electricity access to reduce the use of traditional biomass and back-up generators.
Key emissions benchmarks of Paris compatible Pathways for Nigeria. The 1.5°C compatible range is based on the Paris Agreement compatible pathways from the IPCC SR1.5 filtered with sustainability criteria. The median (50th percentile) to 5th percentile and middle of the range are provided here. Relative reductions are provided based on the reference year.