In its NDC, Botswana expressed a single target of reducing emissions by 15% compared to 2010 levels by 2030. Botswana’s NDC only covers the energy sector, waste and agricultural emissions. Enteric fermentation emissions, which plays a significant role in agricultural emissions, is excluded from the NDC target coverage.1
1.5°C compatible domestic emissions pathways would require Botswana’s emissions to be reduced by 46-57% relative to 2010 levels, excluding LULUCF. This translates to total national emissions between 10-13 MtCO₂e/yr, excluding LULUCF.
It should be noted that historical datasets indicate significantly high variations in the historical emissions for Botswana. As a result, the base year chosen may have a significant effect on the resulting emissions, and subsequently the emission reduction target chosen by a country.20
While Botswana identifies several mitigation actions in its First Biennial Report to achieve the targeted 15% reduction, the country will have to significantly expand and accelerate its interventions for alignment with a 1.5°C compatible trajectory.
The implementation of Botswana’s domestic emissions pathway could be made possible with and through international support to close the gap between its fair share level and domestic emissions level. While Botswana’s NDC does not specify the level of reductions requiring financial support and the level of reductions it aims to reach domestically, it states the need for international support.
Long term pathway
To date, Botswana has not submitted a long-term low emissions development strategy. Our analysis shows that the country would need to emit no more than 7 MtCO₂e/yr by 2050 (excl. LULUCF) to be 1.5°C compatible. This is equivalent to an emissions reduction of 69% below 2010 levels.20
The energy sector would be the first to decarbonise in some scenarios. The remaining emissions would overwhelmingly be from the agriculture sector, with some scenarios indicating minor contributions from the sectors of waste and industrial processes.
On the road to net zero, Botswana would need to balance its remaining emissions through reducing deforestation to increase its land sinks or carbon dioxide removal technologies such as BECCS, which have risks and are accompanied with extensive up-front research and financing costs. As part of efforts to enhance mitigation action in the land sector, the country would need to reduce deforestation and wildfires, and transition from use of traditional biofuels to electrification.1
19 While global cost-effective pathways assessed by the IPCC Special Report 1.5°C provide useful guidance for an upper-limit of emissions trajectories for developed countries, they underestimate the feasible space for such countries to reach net zero earlier. The current generation of models tend to depend strongly on land-use sinks outside of currently developed countries and include fossil fuel use well beyond the time at which these could be phased out, compared to what is understood from bottom-up approaches. The scientific teams which provide these global pathways constantly improve the technologies represented in their models – and novel CDR technologies are now being included in new studies focused on deep mitigation scenarios meeting the Paris Agreement. A wide assessment database of these new scenarios is not yet available; thus, we rely on available scenarios which focus particularly on BECCS as a net-negative emission technology. Accordingly, we do not yet consider land-sector emissions (LULUCF) and other CDR approaches which developed countries will need to implement in order to counterbalance their remaining emissions and reach net zero GHG are not considered here due to data availability.
20 It should also be noted that there are significant discrepancies between the base year emissions expressed in the NDC and in historical datasets. The NDC indicates 2010 emissions as 8.3 MtCO₂e, while historical datasets puts the value at 27 MtCO₂e. The NDC, however, does not account for significant sources of CH₄ emissions from the agriculture sector, and aims to realise its mitigations from the energy sector exclusively. To this end, we have interpreted the baseline indicated in the NDC as being comparable to the energy sector only, as opposed to being representative of the entire emissions baseline for 2010. The calculations provided in these sections therefore rely upon the baseline emissions indicated in the historical datasets for Botswana, as opposed to the NDC.
Botswana primary energy is mostly dominated by fossil fuels, with oil and coal accounting for close to 80% of the total primary energy in 2019.
1.5°C compatible pathways indicate a steep reduction of fossil fuels, reaching around 11% of the fuel mix in 2040, and a complete phase-out by 2050. With residential, transportation, and industrial uses accounting for the majority of energy consumption in the country, these sectors represent the greatest potential for achieving significant decarbonisation.13
This is possible with the rapid uptake of renewable energies, which could make up between 68-98% of the energy mix by 2040. While 20% of Botswana’s energy mix was renewable in 2017, the vast majority of this is from traditional biomass — particularly wood-fuel — which has negative health impacts and sustainability implications.13 Botswana’s uptake of renewable energy has the potential to facilitate a transition from traditional biofuels to electrification, with a key focus on rural areas.1
Lower penetration of renewables would, for Botswana, potentially require the development and upscaling of carbon dioxide removal approaches (CDRs), such as land sinks or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Some models indicate that between 18-30% of the energy mix could be sourced from BECCS between 2040-2050.
These technologies are currently unavailable in Botswana, and would require high up-front costs. These could be avoided by implementing policies to rapidly increase the share of renewable energy in the energy mix and to reduce land-use emissions, and maintain and enhance the role of LULUCF sector — and forests and grasslands in particular — as a significant national carbon sink.1
Key emissions benchmarks of Paris compatible Pathways for Botswana. The 1.5°C compatible range is based on the Paris Agreement compatible pathways from the IPCC SR1.5 filtered with sustainability criteria. The median (50th percentile) to 5th percentile and middle of the range are provided here. Relative reductions are provided based on the reference year.